What does the New York Times have in common with an adult web site that posts anonymous reviews of providers? Sadly, these sources of info/opinions/fantasy (??) have a lot in common now that the New York Times has published an anonymous negative opinion piece about a prominent leader. In both cases we know the authors do not want to identify themselves. Yet the authors do not use the cloak of anonymity to specify exactly what we have to fear from the objects of scorn. We could juxtapose the reviews but we won’t due to copyright laws. If we did we would see the ugly insults but no foundation of factual evidence. We should just take the authors at their words that the hated ones are bad for reasons known only to them. Since unsupported anonymously written negative reviews accomplish nothing but fury, maybe the motives are not what they seem…
View original post 126 more words
